Originally posted by OCEANOS:
[b]Merry Meet KFDugong,
Well of coz there are some truth in it & some which are not but
we leave it to our cognitive process with the benefits of Doubt.
The Truth is they are not loosely connected the time they were
around & they did caught Attention of other organisations
around. Actually the High Priest of that Coven is an acquaintance
of mine other than that i shall have no further commentary. However
the Intricately Organisations i meant are not of that Particular
Coven which is not really considered underground in my perspective
judging from the attention they got, maybe thats why they
left.
Thanks for your post, you are beginning to interest me... A good
sign to start with...Hahaha 
Blessed Be,
Oceanos[/b]
Oh, yeah I got the idea that that particular coven was not one
of the loosely organised ones. The first sign that a coven or some
other similar group is not so called underground based: you do a
google or yahoo search and find a website hosted by them or about
them.
the really really underground and dark ones are those that NEVER
turn up on search engines, NEVER get reported in the papers, and
never have a prominent figurehead leader which people can take
notice of. Or alternatively, there is a red herring where
leadership is concerned.
BUT have you ever looked around yourself, your surroundings, at the
local coffeeshop, supermarket, or community club even and noticed,
or perhaps, sensed that
not everything about a person/group is as it seems? This is what i
mean when I say I personally have grown a little suspicious of
things...
sad to say, I find i have very weak intuitive senses, or at least,
it appears unharnessed... maybe its because I am too easily
distracted and have a short attention span.
btw thanks for the compliment 
